A legend for your source labels
सेटअप और एक्यूरेसीयहाँ जाता है: चैट सेटिंग्स
If you use labels or naming conventions on sources ('[DRAFT]', '[2019 — dated]', '[opposing view]'), the notebook doesn't know what they mean until you tell it. This template turns your naming scheme into instructions the model actually follows.
शेयर किया idea: Saikat Basu (MakeUseOf) — असली हकदार को क्रेडिट।
My sources use a naming convention. Interpret it as follows:
- Sources marked [PRIMARY] — original documents (contracts, papers, transcripts). Prefer these for every factual claim.
- Sources marked [SECONDARY] — commentary and summaries. Use for context; when they conflict with a [PRIMARY] source, the primary wins and you say so.
- Sources marked [DRAFT] or [INTERNAL] — unfinished thinking. Never quote these as established positions.
- Sources marked [DATED — year] — accurate as of that year. Flag the age whenever you rely on one.
- Sources marked [OPPOSING] — included to represent the other side. Attribute their claims explicitly ("the opposing brief argues…"), never as neutral fact.
[Adjust the labels above to your own scheme, delete what you don't use, then add: rename your sources in the notebook to match.]इसे कैसे इस्तेमाल करें
- 1अपनी नोटबुक खोलें और चैट पैनल में Customize (चैट सेटिंग्स) पर क्लिक करें।
- 2प्रॉम्प्ट को नोटबुक के कस्टम इंस्ट्रक्शन्स के तौर पर पेस्ट करें और सेव करें।
- 3अब यह इस नोटबुक में पूछे गए हर सवाल पर लागू होगा।
स्क्वेयर ब्रैकेट्स उन हिस्सों को दिखाते हैं जिन्हें आपको अपने टॉपिक या सवाल से बदलना है।
और सेटअप और एक्यूरेसी प्रॉम्प्ट्स
- The complete chat-settings templateNotebookLM's custom instructions take up to 10,000 characters, and almost everyone leaves them empty. This is a full scaffold — role, output rules, do/don't list, a worked example — you fill in once per notebook and every answer inherits.
- Grounding guardrails: supported, inferred, or absentThe accuracy block for high-stakes notebooks: every claim gets labelled as supported, inferred or absent from the sources, disagreements are shown instead of averaged, and "I don't know" becomes a first-class answer.
- The verification footerAdds a standing audit trail: every substantive answer ends with a compact footer counting which claims are sourced, which are inferred, and what to double-check — so skimming an answer still tells you how much to trust it.
- साइटेशन-फोर्सिंग पिन्ड नोटu/Inside-techminds के सोर्स-स्ट्रक्चर वर्कफ्लो से: इसे पिन करें और हर जवाब पहले से वेरिफिकेशन के लिए तैयार होकर आएगा।