G

Triage your sources before you synthesise

Workflows使う場所: チャット

Step one of any multi-source project. Run this before asking for a synthesis and it tells you which sources actually earn their place, which duplicate each other, and where the collection has a hole. Ten good sources beat fifty mediocre ones, and this is how you find out which ten you have.

Act as a research librarian assessing this collection before I synthesise it.

For each selected source, give me one row:
- Title
- What it uniquely contributes that no other source here does
- Quality signal: primary evidence / secondary reporting / opinion / promotional
- Keep, merge with [which source], or drop — and one line of why

Then, separately:
1. Which sources substantially duplicate each other?
2. What question would I want to answer from this collection that nothing here covers?
3. If I could add exactly two sources, what should they be?

Judge only what is in the sources. If you cannot tell what kind of source something is, say so rather than guessing.

使い方

  1. 1notebooklm.google.com でノートブックを開きます。
  2. 2[角括弧]の部分を、ご自身の内容に置き換えます。
  3. 3プロンプトをチャット欄に貼り付けて送信します。

角括弧の部分は、ご自身のトピックや質問に置き換えてください。

workflowsの他のプロンプト