Compare arguments across sources

Deep analysisGoes in: Chat

Get a side-by-side breakdown of the central argument in each source — and where they actually disagree.

Shared by Sourclip — credit where it's due.

Compare the main arguments across every source in this notebook.

For each source, list:
- Its central thesis (one sentence).
- The two strongest pieces of evidence it cites.
- What it underweights, ignores, or assumes without justification.

Then produce a comparison table with three columns — "Agree", "Partially agree", "Disagree" — showing where the sources sit on the 4–6 most important sub-questions.

How to use it

1Open your notebook at notebooklm.google.com.
2Replace the [bracketed] parts with your specifics.
3Paste the prompt into the chat box and send it.

Square brackets mark the parts you replace with your own topic or question.

More deep analysis prompts

The senior-researcher synthesisA full academic-review harness: rules, process and a seven-part output structure. The most complete research prompt the community has shared.
The insight meta-prompt (v5.1)Doesn't summarize - it red-teams your notes and designs five custom prompts to expose blind spots. The author runs it in Gemini with the notebook attached; it also works pasted into Gemini Notebook chat.
Neural triangulationThree lenses on the same question - analytical, creative, skeptical - to break confirmation bias before an important decision.
Index the sources firstThe opening move of the workflow u/Able_Orchid_3818 shared: index before you ask anything, especially on messy transcripts and overlapping PDFs.