The prompt improvement cycle

WorkflowsGoes in: Chat

For prompts you will run more than once. Instead of tweaking wording and hoping, this makes the notebook grade its own last answer against the sources, then rewrite the prompt that produced it. Three passes usually gets further than an afternoon of manual fiddling.

Shared by Guillaume Martin (notebooklm-prompts) — credit where it's due.

Act as a prompt engineer reviewing your own previous answer.

Step 1 — Grade it. Mark each claim in your last answer as: supported by the sources, inferred beyond them, or unsupported. Give the counts.

Step 2 — Diagnose the prompt, not the answer. Which instruction in my prompt allowed the weak parts through? Be specific about the wording at fault: vagueness, a missing constraint, or an assumption I left implicit.

Step 3 — Rewrite my prompt so those failures are impossible rather than discouraged. Keep it as short as the job allows.

Step 4 — Name the one thing your rewritten prompt still cannot guarantee, so I know what to check by hand.

How to use it

  1. 1Open your notebook at notebooklm.google.com.
  2. 2Replace the [bracketed] parts with your specifics.
  3. 3Paste the prompt into the chat box and send it.

Square brackets mark the parts you replace with your own topic or question.

More workflows prompts