Triage your sources before you synthesise

WorkflowsVai em: Chat

Step one of any multi-source project. Run this before asking for a synthesis and it tells you which sources actually earn their place, which duplicate each other, and where the collection has a hole. Ten good sources beat fifty mediocre ones, and this is how you find out which ten you have.

Act as a research librarian assessing this collection before I synthesise it.

For each selected source, give me one row:
- Title
- What it uniquely contributes that no other source here does
- Quality signal: primary evidence / secondary reporting / opinion / promotional
- Keep, merge with [which source], or drop — and one line of why

Then, separately:
1. Which sources substantially duplicate each other?
2. What question would I want to answer from this collection that nothing here covers?
3. If I could add exactly two sources, what should they be?

Judge only what is in the sources. If you cannot tell what kind of source something is, say so rather than guessing.

Como usar

  1. 1Abra seu notebook em notebooklm.google.com.
  2. 2Substitua as partes [entre colchetes] pelas suas informações.
  3. 3Cole o prompt na caixa de chat e envie.

Colchetes marcam as partes que você substitui pelo seu tema ou pergunta.

Mais prompts de workflows